SNAP access, queueing theory, and procedural due process

Due Process on Hold

A queueing framework for measuring and improving access to SNAP benefits

Andrew Daw, Chloe Pache, Angela Zhou

The operational due process problem:

Tens of millions of Americans rely on SNAP and other social services, where call centers are the gateway to interviews, recertification, case updates, and application help.

When call centers are overloaded, legally required steps are practically impossible.

In Missouri, nearly half of SNAP denials were procedural - applicants couldn't complete application steps.

Why current call-center guidance is not enough:

Standard queueing and call-center guidance (Erlang-A) misses the key urgency of social service: callers need to get through, so they'll call back if they can't get through.

We develop a queueing model and performance evaluation framework that includes key SNAP and social service issues:

  • Callers who can't get through will call back for essential services.
  • Even successful callers may need to call back for follow-ups.

Same staffing, different dynamics

Abandonment is not always an exit.

Erlang-A treats callers who abandon as leaving the system. In SNAP access, many callers still need the interview, so abandonment and follow-ups can become new demand on the same staffed queue.

Calibration cue from the paper: call center #2 has c=117.8 staff, AHT=52.0 min, observed arrivals 2931.5 calls/day; staffing-curve examples use (θA, θS, θL) = (4, 3, 3).

Same daily demand reaches the same staffed queue.

Takeaway: current staffing guidance that omits endogenous congestion is too optimistic because it treats abandoned calls as gone, not recycled demand.

Displayed quantities are illustrative, time-averaged outcomes for the same normalized demand. The moving circles show flow, not instantaneous rates.

Animated comparison of Erlang-A abandonment and redial feedback Both lanes use the same staffing. In the Erlang-A lane, abandonment exits. In the SNAP-access lane, redials and follow-ups return to the same queue and raise effective load. Erlang-A abandonment exits Applicants/ Callers Wait Abandon Connect Enroll
new demand recycled redials/follow-ups abandonment able to enroll
92 Erlang-A expected enrolled
92 SNAP feedback expected enrolled
8 Erlang-A expected abandonment
8 With redials expected abandonment
0 Expected redials + follow-ups
Erlang-A mean effective load
Feedback mean effective load

Performance evaluation framework

Service design changes can improve access directly and through the feedback loop.

The model lets agencies compare staffing and process-design bundles against the same queue outcomes: wait, abandonment, repeat demand, and enrollment.

Capacity lever: staff c

More agents move callers out of wait.

direct indirect

More staffed capacity directly increases the rate at which callers connect. The downstream effect is smaller abandonment piles and fewer redials feeding back into tomorrow's queue.

Service-design intervention effects on the access queue Selecting an intervention keeps the same access-queue structure and highlights only the direct and indirect deltas. Applicants/ Callers Wait Connect Enroll Abandon Redials Follow-ups capacity delta completion delta arrival-pressure delta fewer abandonments fewer returns
+14 enrollment delta
-9 abandonment delta
-11 return-demand delta
-18% feedback-load delta